data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3664/e3664a667589daa0a112fec120ab6f6c60091b03" alt=""
Another couple of turbulent weeks have gone by. Back at the beginning of May I finished a chapter of my dissertation, or so I thought. Then I met via Skype with my faculty supervisors, and got a real kick in the gut. Short version is, I am attempting a theological interpretation of the stories of saints of long ago, but my original supervisors are no longer with the university, and my new ones aren't theologians. They are wonderful, accomplished, and caring historians, but each time I submit my work with an interpretation of the meaning of the text as the conclusion, they freeze. They tell me quite honestly, "It's not what we do." And they're right, but it is what I do, or hope to do.
It has taken a couple of weeks for me to recover from their criticism, in part because it feels nearly unresolvable (although that's an open question still), but even more because it strikes so deeply at what I feel I'm really good at. And it's really important to me to be acknowledged for being good at things that I think I'm good at. See where I'm going here?